Blog
In December 2025, the world got a rare look behind the razor wire.
Shunda Park — a purpose-built “office park” in Min Let Pan, Karen State — wasn’t designed to create jobs, grow the local economy, or serve a community. It was engineered to industrialize deception: rows of computers, staged “executive” rooms for video calls, scripts and notebooks on how to manipulate victims, and a culture that celebrated theft like a sales milestone. Reports describe thousands of workers from dozens of countries, some trafficked or coerced, pushed through relentless quotas and brutal punishment systems.
And here’s the part too many people miss: Karen communities didn’t build this. Karen communities are living inside the blast radius—caught between war, displacement, and transnational crime networks that use conflict zones as cover.
As Iran’s protest movement intensifies, the Islamic Republic has moved on two tracks at once: cut the country off from the internet while flooding state TV with curated messaging—including Persian-dubbed Tucker Carlson content.
Sources inside Iran are consistent with what outside reporting has captured: when the internet is throttled, IRIB becomes the loudest—and for many, the only—national feed. In that information vacuum, clips from Carlson’s interview with Iran’s leadership can be edited into “proof” that the regime is right and its critics are liars.
Part I — The Blackout: Why the Regime Turns the Internet Off First
Recent reporting describes Iran instituting an internet blackout as protests spread and the state escalates threats and repression.
This is not just censorship—it’s operational control:
Disable protest coordination (group chats, meet-ups, rapid response to security deployments).
Stop visual evidence (videos of shootings, arrests, funerals) from circulating.
Delay and distort casualty reality long enough for state TV to define the narrative first.
With the internet constrained, the regime’s messaging doesn’t need to “win” online—it just needs to dominate the offline channel (television) that remains available.
Why Greenland matters strategically (the core drivers)
1) Geography that plugs straight into North America’s defense network
Greenland sits on the shortest “great-circle” routes between North America and Europe—and between Russia’s Arctic and North America. That geography is why the U.S. has maintained a major defense presence there since the early Cold War under a U.S.–Denmark defense agreement.
What that buys the U.S.:
Earlier warning time for threats coming over the Arctic (the fastest path for many missile trajectories).
A forward sensor position that’s hard to replicate elsewhere because Greenland is physically “in the way” of the Arctic approach.
2) Pituffik (Thule) = missile warning + missile defense sensing + space domain missions
The U.S. Space Force is explicit about why Pituffik Space Base exists: it supports Missile Warning, Missile Defense, and Space Surveillance through its radar and tracking capabilities.
Across Iran, a new wave of nationwide protests has grown from economic anger into open rejection of the Islamic Republic—despite live-fire crackdowns, mass arrests, and a near-total communications blackout that appears designed to conceal the scale of repression.
What’s happening right now (latest status)
Protests: Demonstrations that began in late December 2025 have continued into January 2026, spreading beyond Tehran into many cities and provinces, with reports of strikes, market closures, and campus activity.
Internet blackout: Iranian authorities have sharply restricted or cut off internet and international connectivity—making it harder to document deaths, arrests, or abuses, and harder for families to locate detained relatives.
Crackdown: Multiple human rights organizations report lethal force, arbitrary detention, and intimidation tactics used against protesters and bystanders.
Because Iran’s communications have been disrupted, fatality and detention totals vary by source and can change quickly; reputable outlets and rights monitors consistently emphasize that confirmed figures may undercount the real toll.
On January 3, 2026, the United States launched a raid in Caracas—part of an operation publicly described as “Operation Resolve”—and captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife, moving them into U.S. custody. That single event has already triggered rapid aftershocks inside Venezuela, across the Caribbean, and among the extra-hemispheric powers that treated Caracas as a strategic foothold.
What happens next isn’t just a Venezuelan transition story. It is a regional stress test—and potentially a global one.
1) Why Venezuela is the keystone domino
For years, Venezuela functioned as more than a troubled petrostate. It became an operational hub where aligned governments could trade oil, move money, share intelligence methods, and test how far influence could reach inside the Americas.
The capture of Maduro doesn’t automatically produce stable democracy or immediate economic recovery. But it does disrupt the architecture that made Venezuela useful to other regimes—especially those that benefited from sanctions-dodging networks, security cooperation, and politically protected oil flows.
A Raid That Shook the World
On January 3, 2026, an unprecedented United States military operation unfolded in the heart of Caracas, Venezuela. In a predawn raid code-named Operation Absolute Resolve, U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, flying them to New York to face federal charges in U.S. courts. The action stunned global audiences and marked one of the boldest uses of U.S. special operations since the post-9/11 era.
The raid involved elite U.S. units, including Delta Force and other Special Operations forces, backed by months of intelligence, drone surveillance, and a coordinated air and ground assault. Although U.S. officials described the mission as a decisive blow against narcotics trafficking and authoritarian rule, the scale and technology displayed have ignited intense debate worldwide.
Beyond Bullets: Claims of Sci-Fi-Like Directed-Energy Use
In the first week of January 2026, Gen. Saw Nerdah Mya announced what many Karen have long believed was inevitable: Kaw Thoo Lei is declaring independence and standing up a new political structure—the Republic of Kawthoolei—with a Government of Kawthoolei with Nerdah Mya named as president. Khaosod English nationthailand
It is the clearest statement yet that Karen self-determination will not be negotiated forever while power brokers enrich themselves, the military manipulates peace talks, and the borderlands are poisoned by scam economies.
What was announced
Reporting in Thai and regional outlets describes a formal declaration and a provisional government framework—what supporters are treating as the political vehicle for sovereignty. Khaosod English nationthailand
Khaosod English reports Nerdah Mya grounded the declaration in ancestral land claims and international human-rights conventions, arguing the Burma (Myanmar) has collapsed and that the Karen are therefore establishing an independent state. Khaosod English
Cambodia says it has arrested three Chinese nationals — Chen Zhi (founder/chairman of Cambodia’s Prince Group), Xu Ji Liang, and Shao Ji Hui — and extradited them to China at Beijing’s request as part of cooperation against transnational crime. Cambodia’s Interior Ministry also said Chen’s Cambodian citizenship had been revoked. Reuters
The announcement is significant because Chen Zhi has been at the center of a fast-growing international focus on Southeast Asia–based online fraud rings — networks that investigators say generate billions of dollars by running industrial-scale scams, often out of guarded compounds where trafficked workers are forced to work. Reuters
Who is Chen Zhi and what is Prince Group?
Chen Zhi is known publicly as the head of Prince Holding Group / Prince Group, a large Cambodia-based business conglomerate with interests in areas like real estate and finance. Department of Justice
A reported CIA assessment, described by The Wall Street Journal, warns that Venezuela’s opposition would face major difficulty running a temporary government—and that top figures already inside the regime’s governing structure are “best placed” to lead in the immediate aftermath of Maduro’s removal. Wall Street Journal
That assessment hits as Venezuela enters a high-risk phase: the old system is still armed, still organized, and now openly framing events as “imperial aggression,” while the opposition is being pushed to claim authority without controlling the machinery of the state.
The core problem: you can’t govern what you don’t control
Even if the opposition is recognized internationally or has popular momentum, governing requires instant command of security forces, ministries, courts, ports, fuel distribution, and the national payroll. The intelligence warning—opposition struggles, insiders best positioned—reflects a hard reality: the regime’s institutional spine doesn’t disappear just because Maduro is gone. Wall Street Journal
Retaliation is already underway against anyone seen as pro-U.S.
This is the most explosive accelerant—and it directly targets “anyone supporting U.S. interests.”
Why Delcy Rodríguez is the wrong choice, and why Edmundo González Urrutia—with María Corina Machado—is the better path
Venezuela cannot claim a democratic transition while placing Delcy Rodríguez at the controls. Rodríguez is not a neutral caretaker. She is a core architect of the Maduro-era state, elevated by the same power centers—military and Supreme Court—that protected the regime. AP News
AP reporting describes Rodríguez as a longtime Maduro ally who governed much of Venezuela’s economy and intelligence services, with strong ties to the regime’s elite networks. AP News Reuters similarly frames her as one of the country’s most powerful socialist-era operators, holding multiple top posts across government. Reuters
The credibility test: 2024’s election mandate points away from Rodríguez
Washington politics has a tell: when a leader’s “principles” shift depending on whether the outcome helps or hurts the other side, the public isn’t watching policy anymore—it’s watching positioning. Senator Chuck Schumer’s record on Venezuela is a case study in that credibility problem.
In February 2020, Schumer mocked President Trump’s Venezuela approach as a failure because it did not remove Nicolás Maduro. In January 2026, Schumer condemned Trump’s Venezuela military action as reckless and unlawful because it did escalate—without Congress and without a plan. Put together, the message to Americans becomes: Trump is wrong when he doesn’t act, and he’s wrong when he acts. That kind of “heads I win, tails you lose” posture is exactly how public trust gets shredded.
The 2020 attack: “It flopped… he hasn’t brought an end to the Maduro regime.”
Authoritarians don’t start by debating you. They start by disconnecting you.
When protests swell, when journalists publish, when a people try to speak with one voice, oppressive governments reach for the same lever again and again: control the communications layer. Slow the network. Block platforms. Cut the power. Jam signals. Arrest anyone who posts the truth. Freedom House has tracked this trend for years—and reports that global internet freedom has declined for 15 consecutive years, driven by censorship, surveillance, and repression. Freedom House
That’s the battlefield Elon Musk walked onto with Starlink—whether the world was ready for it or not.
Venezuela isn’t being discussed as just another troubled nation. It’s being framed as something far bigger: an operational hub—a place where power, influence, and systems of control were allegedly refined, exported, and used to shape outcomes far beyond its borders.
The argument is simple: if you want to understand what’s happening now, you have to rewind.
The Warning Broadcast on CNN That Still Echoes Today
In 2006, CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight ran reports focused on something that struck at the heart of American sovereignty: who controls the tools that run elections.
Dobbs opened one segment with a blunt claim that the federal government had failed to address a threat to election integrity:
“New evidence that the federal government has ignored a threat to the integrity of our elections.” CNN Transcripts
On January 3–4, 2026, the images that raced across phones and TV screens felt unreal to millions of Venezuelans: Nicolás Maduro removed from power and flown to the United States, now detained in New York as prosecutors move forward with criminal cases. AP News ABC News
And almost immediately—wherever Venezuelans could safely gather—celebration broke out.
The sound of relief: flags, tears, and the word “liberty”
In South Florida—especially Doral, a hub for Venezuelans who fled persecution and collapse—crowds wrapped themselves in Venezuelan flags, chanted for freedom, and treated the news like the end of a long night. AP News AP News
Outside the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, where Maduro is reportedly being held, Venezuelan expatriates gathered again—this time with a different kind of emotion: grief for what was lost, gratitude for survival, and a fierce hope that Venezuela might finally be returned to its people. AP News
A dictator’s modus operandi (their operating method) is simple: turn the state into a loyalty machine. The regime doesn’t exist to protect everyone’s rights. It exists to keep one person (or one clique) in power—and it does that by rewarding supporters and punishing everyone who won’t kneel.
Modus operandi—“how they operate.”
1) The Deal: “Support me, and you’ll get taken care of.”
Dictators don’t maintain control with elections and equal rights. They maintain control with selective benefits:
cash transfers, subsidies, cheap fuel, free food boxes
government jobs and contracts
permits, licenses, and “special access”
protection from prosecution (for loyal insiders)
This isn’t generosity. It’s transactional loyalty—a political economy built on “favorites.” Research on dictatorships and patronage describes exactly this dynamic: dictators often rely on patronage (targeted rewards) to keep political support. PIDE Files
2) The Machine: Patronage + Clientelism = Control
The practical advantage of a Western Hemisphere–focused security strategy is simple: the threats that most directly touch American communities overwhelmingly originate close to home—through land borders, regional migration routes, maritime corridors, and criminal networks that operate across the Americas. The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) explicitly frames the Western Hemisphere as a top-tier priority for preventing mass migration, disrupting “narco-terrorists, cartels, and other transnational criminal organizations,” protecting key assets and supply chains, and ensuring U.S. access to strategic locations—describing this approach as enforcing a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine. The White House
What that means in practice is that the Western Hemisphere becomes a “homeland-and-near-abroad” security perimeter: reduce destabilization in the region, deny hostile outside powers room to build leverage, and choke off the drug/trafficking pipelines that fuel violence and addiction in the United States.
The core advantage: move the fight outward, not inward
Iran is rising again—not as a temporary outburst, but as a national rejection of a system that survives by fear, propaganda, and force.
What began as an economic revolt—shopkeepers shutting their doors, families crushed by inflation, and a currency in freefall—has rapidly widened into something unmistakably political: crowds chanting against the supreme leader, demanding an end to the Islamic Republic’s coercive rule, and reviving the spirit of “Woman, Life, Freedom.” AP News Al Jazeera
This is what freedom movements look like before the world can neatly summarize them. They start with bread—and quickly become about dignity.
The spark: economic collapse that exposed political rot
Iran’s current unrest is being driven by a familiar truth: when a regime destroys opportunity, it eventually destroys obedience.
A Nation Reclaimed: Venezuela’s Chance to Break from Communism and CorruptionMaduro’s main opposition leader vs. the 2024 “winner”: who’s who?
María Corina Machado (opposition movement leader)
Role: The political engine of the anti-Maduro coalition—widely described as the “leader of the democratic forces.” European Parliament
2024 status: She won the opposition primary but was barred from running by Venezuela’s institutions aligned with the regime. Le Monde.fr
Strength: Grassroots mobilization, message discipline, and coalition pressure—she’s the figure most identified with the opposition’s broader “change” movement. European Parliament
Edmundo González Urrutia (the opposition’s 2024 presidential candidate)
Role: The unity/consensus candidate the opposition placed on the ballot after Machado was blocked. European Parliament
2024 “winner” claim: Many observers and governments said the official authorities did not provide transparent, polling-station-level results, while the opposition published tally sheets supporting González’s win; the Carter Center said it could not verify the CNE’s declared results and the election did not meet democratic integrity standards. The Carter Center
International recognition: The U.S. recognized González as “president-elect” in late 2024. The Guardian
Early Saturday, January 3, 2026, President Donald Trump said the United States captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife and flew them out of Venezuela, in the context of what he described as a large-scale U.S. strike. AP News Reuters
Venezuela’s government, for its part, issued statements condemning what it called U.S. “military aggression,” reporting attacks in Caracas and nearby states and declaring emergency measures. Reuters
What we know so far
Trump said Maduro and his wife were captured and flown out of the country. Reuters
Reporting describes explosions, low-flying aircraft, and strikes near key military sites in/around Caracas, plus power disruptions. AP News
The FAA reportedly restricted U.S. flights over Venezuelan airspace due to the situation. Financial Times
The immediate question: Who governs Venezuela now that Maduro is removed?
Burma (Myanmar)’s junta didn’t “win” an election this week. It manufactured one.
What happened on December 28 (Phase 1 of a three-stage vote, with additional phases scheduled for January 11 and January 25) was not a democratic contest. It was a state-run legitimization exercise—organized amid civil war, enforced through repression, and structured to ensure the military’s proxy forces emerge “victorious” regardless of what ordinary people want. AP News+2Reuters+2
Below is how the rigging works—step by step—and why the outcome is effectively predetermined.
1) Rigging starts with who is allowed to exist in politics
A real election requires real opposition. The junta ensured that wouldn’t happen.
Australia’s modern bargain on public safety has long been clear: restrict access to rapid-fire weapons, and let trained, accountable institutions carry the burden of protection when the unthinkable happens. On the night of Dec. 14, 2025, at a public Hanukkah/Chanukah celebration on Bondi Beach, that bargain was tested in the harshest possible way—when a father and son opened fire on a Jewish gathering, killing 15 people and wounding many more. Authorities have described the attack as antisemitic and terrorism inspired by Islamic State ideology. Reuters AP News
The alleged gunmen—Sajid Akram (50) and his son Naveed Akram (24)—were quickly linked by investigators to pro–Islamic State networks and symbolism, including flags allegedly found after the attack, as police and national leaders moved to reassure a community already rattled by a documented surge in antisemitic incidents since Oct. 2023. AP News Reuters
The number “65,000” is not a rhetorical flourish. It is effectively a shorthand for a documented global count: 66,872 Islamist terrorist attacks recorded worldwide from 1979 through 12 April 2024, causing at least 249,941 deaths, according to a large-scale assessment published by Fondapol. Fondation pour l'Innovation Politique
That single dataset frames the modern era of terrorism in hard numbers: tens of thousands of attacks, a quarter-million dead, and a pace of violence that accelerates sharply in the last decade.
The verified baseline: 66,872 attacks, ≥249,941 dead (1979–Apr 2024)
Fondapol’s headline findings are straightforward:
Attacks: 66,872 Islamist terrorist attacks worldwide
Deaths: ≥249,941
Concentration: 84.4% of the recorded attacks occurred from 2013–Apr 2024 Fondation pour l'Innovation Politique
The timeline makes the surge unmistakable:
1979–2000: 2,194 attacks; 6,817 deaths
2001–2012: 8,265 attacks; 38,187 deaths
2013–Apr 2024: 56,413 attacks; 204,937 deaths Fondation pour l'Innovation Politique
On December 25, 2025 (Christmas Day), the United States launched a major strike in northwestern Nigeria against ISIS-linked militants, after a string of attacks and abductions that have left many Christian communities fearing that the holiday season has become an open invitation for terror. The Washington Post Reuters AP News
For families trying to worship in peace, the pattern is brutally familiar: armed men arrive without warning, services are interrupted by gunfire, worshippers are dragged away, and entire communities are left to decide whether gathering to pray is worth risking their lives.
The violence Christians are facing right now
In the days leading up to Christmas, Nigeria saw fresh attacks on churches and churchgoers that sharpened international attention on Christian vulnerability in parts of the country.
What’s been reported over the last few weeks is hard to read: pastors detained, church leaders formally arrested, families separating or fleeing, and worship pushed further into fear and hiding—right as Christians prepare for Christmas. The Guardian
This is a deep dive into what’s documented in recent reporting and human-rights monitoring.
1) The central event: a nationwide sweep hitting church leaders across multiple cities
What happened (dates and numbers that are consistently reported)
Oct 10–11, 2025: Chinese authorities carried out a coordinated operation detaining nearly 30 pastors, preachers, and members connected to Beijing Zion Church across multiple cities (reported as seven cities by Human Rights Watch). Human Rights Watch
Nov 19, 2025: 18 leaders were reported as formally arrested and could face up to three years in prison on a charge described as “illegally using information networks.” Reuters
Dec 23, 2025: Major reporting describes this as the most significant wave of pressure against independent Christian communities in years—with detentions continuing into the Christmas season and families describing terror and uncertainty. The Guardian
A growing public backlash: “Stop trying to run our lives, rewrite our identity, and police our beliefs”
Across multiple democracies, elections and street protests are increasingly shaped by a single, consistent demand: limits on government power.
In country after country, large segments of the public are signaling that they are tired of:
expanding state control (taxation, spending, regulation, bureaucracy),
top-down speech and information enforcement, and
political projects that treat national identity, tradition, and faith as something to be managed, softened, or replaced.
This isn’t presented by voters as an abstract theory. It is expressed as a practical refusal: “You don’t get to force us into one approved worldview.” That mood is now driving real political outcomes.
If you are about to send your son or daughter to a university without doing serious research, you are gambling with the most important investment you’ve made for 18 years: their mind, their character, their future, and their stability.
This is not about being paranoid. It’s about being responsible.
A university is not just classrooms and majors. It is a 24/7 ecosystem—friends, parties, beliefs, authority structures, policies, and pressures—that will shape your child faster than you think. If that ecosystem is toxic, permissive, predatory, ideologically rigid, or academically indifferent, it can pull apart in one year what your family spent nearly two decades building.
And the consequences are not theoretical.
Parents have watched it happen:
A high-potential student becomes a heavy drinker because “everyone does it here.”
A motivated kid stops going to class, fails out, and spirals into shame and isolation.
Debt piles up, confidence collapses, and the student drops out with no plan and no support.
A student loses their moral compass, gets confused, depressed, and detached from family and faith.
A student gets stuck in a campus culture where dissent is punished and conformity is rewarded.
A student ends up in a downward track—academic failure, addiction, homelessness, legal trouble, or simply a life that never recovers the momentum it once had.
Japan is widely recognized for maintaining highly managed immigration: defined legal categories, strict status controls, and comparatively lower long-run immigration intensity than most peer countries. The OECD summarizes Japan’s position clearly: Japan has one of the lowest foreign-born shares in the OECD—2.2% in 2021, versus 10.4% across the OECD. OECD
This approach matters because many of the immigration stresses now affecting the United States, parts of Europe, and other Western democracies tend to emerge when inflows outpace governance capacity—border control, asylum adjudication, interior enforcement, housing, and integration systems.
1) Japan channels entry through narrow, rule-based lanes
Japan’s inflows are strongly structured around work and study pathways. The OECD reports that approximately half of immigrants living in Japan are there for work or study, with major shares falling into high-skilled categories, trainees, and international students. OECD
Policy strength: A status-driven system is easier to govern than “mixed flows” where irregular entry, humanitarian claims, and labor migration blend together and create long-term limbo.
A fact-focused deep dive on Qatar’s influence operations in the U.S.—and what can and cannot be proven about “proxy” commentators
1) What Qatar can reliably be shown to do in the U.S.
A. Qatar runs large-scale, legal influence operations (lobbying + PR)
Qatar’s influence footprint in Washington is not a conspiracy theory; it’s a standard modern-state playbook: FARA-registered firms, relationship cultivation, and message placement. The Quincy Institute describes Qatar’s spending through FARA-registered lobbyists/PR firms as on the order of hundreds of millions since 2016. Quincy Institute
A Mob Walked Into a Church Mid-Worship to Protest ICE — and Yes, That Should Shock Normal People
Let’s call this what it was: a coordinated group entered a church sanctuary during a Sunday service, chanted political slogans, and effectively forced the service to end early. That’s not “speaking truth to power.” That’s crossing a line most decent people—religious or not—instinctively know shouldn’t be crossed.
The church was Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. The protesters reportedly included members of Racial Justice Network and Black Lives Matter Minnesota. They went inside during worship and shouted “ICE out!” and demanded “Justice for Renee Good.” In addition, former CNN commentator Don Lemon was part of this group.